« Fewer & Further Between | Main | More on the Wendy's Finger Incident »

Before

As I try to figure out where I fit, I’ve been thinking more about where I’ve come from. 

I was born and raised in a Reformed Episcopal church.  It’s a small denomination, but theologically is (or at least was) pretty close to presbyterian.  They keep the liturgical tradition of the Episcopal church, which I love.  They also keep the the church leadership structure of the episcopal church, which I’m not crazy about.  Otherwise it’s very “reformed” in the same sort of calvanistic way as the Presbyterian church (in fact, they were so close that when my churches pastor retired when I was in high school a presbyterian pastor was hired as our interim).

In college I became very active in leadership with InterVarsity christian fellowship, an interdenominational group.  I had lots of friends with all sorts of theological backgrounds.  Through that group I learned a lot respecting differing views throughout christendom and focusing on what is really important, what one of my pastors would later describe to me as the “non-negotiables”, of our faith.

Later I went to work as an intern at a Presbyterian church, a church in the more traditional PCA.  I agreed with a lot of their theology, some not so much.  After that I worked for three years in another presbyterian church, this time a church in the more liberal PCUSA.  Once again, I agreed with a lot of their beliefs, and found some things that I didn’t agree with.

Now I’m considering joining a Baptist church, and I’m really enjoying the “emergent church” conversations that are going one throughout the area/country/world.

I must seem VERY confused.  After all, I don’t think there is any group/denomination out there that I theologically agree with 100%.  So, if that’s the case where do I fit?  Am I presbyterian, reformed episcopal, am I reformed at all?  Am I interdenominational, non-denominational, baptist, emergent?

In the end I have come to view it very similarly to how I view my cultural heritage.  Americans have a fascination with “what” we are.  Almost everyone I know can tell you what country or countries their ancestors came from, even if it’s been a hundred years or more since their family lived there.  I’m no different, I know that I’m on quarter British, one quarter German, one quarter Norwegian and one quarter Ukrainian.  However, somewhere around High School I realized that while it’s important to know where we come from it’s not who I am, I AM American.

I view my theological background much the same way.  I’m some strange mix of reformed episcopal and presbyterian calvanism with emerging tendencies, but I AM a Christian.  I’m tired of being labeled, and I’m tired of trying to label myself, I just want to follow Christ.

Just my $.02

Posted on Wednesday, April 13, 2005 at 09:51AM by Registered Commentermo in , | Comments9 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (9)

right on brother. please email me your new address and phone number, I will give you a call soon. Peace
April 13, 2005 | Unregistered Commenterkevin
Where do I fit?
I currently live, worship, and teach on the Navajo Reservation. This is not "mission" work, I am here by choice and by the grace of God. Fitting in for me has become a real issue, since I am one of the few white people in this community. Kind of like being the only United Methodist at a Charasmatic Worship service. I too am tired of labels. I am glad that the LORD does not expect us to all be the same...that His Body has many parts. Remember in all of this that the main thing is the main thing is the answer to the question, who then do you say I am????He is Jesus, the Christ!
April 13, 2005 | Unregistered CommenterMaryellen
Kevin, I'll get you that info soon. How's you're little one doing?

Maryellen, that must be tough, but I'm sure it's exciting too. God must be teaching you SO much through that experience. I'd love to hear more about it.
April 14, 2005 | Registered Commentermo
good word, mo. believe me... i've been going through the same ringer as of late. thanks for the perspective on us as "americans." that helps describe "why" we feel as we do...

ultimately, i go w/ what my wife says: "i'm a christian." hehehe. the whole denominational thing is an unfortunate result of PROTESTantism. maybe someday our children will have less of a difficulty dealing with all this stuff...
April 15, 2005 | Unregistered Commenteradam
Thanks Adam,
Just one thing, let's not be so quick to diss protestantism/denominationalism. Maybe it's just the historian in me, but I believe it had/has it's place.

I for one, am interested to see how the denominations deal with the change from modernism into the new emerging culture, but more on that later.
April 15, 2005 | Registered Commentermo
i wasn't dissing protestantism. just stating that it was an unfortnate result of it all (which, i think, it is).

as far as weathering the whole transitional thing, i think that some denominations will make it through (perhaps most). they'll look/opperate differently, and it'll be our generation and some of our parents generation that makes it happen. it's going to be those that don't fall into either extreme of: (1) no change/ignoring culture or (2) total theological revamp and courting the culture (syncretism).

btw, i heard an awesome brief historical thing about the papacy on NPR today. you can probably find it on the web. brought me back to my history of christianity classes.......
April 15, 2005 | Unregistered Commenteradam
Which is an unfortunate result? Is division an unfortunate result of protestantism or is protestantism an unfortunate result of something? modernity?

We have similar thoughts on the transition thing...but we already knew that. I'm going to try to flesh out my thoughts a little more on the last post in this series.
April 15, 2005 | Registered Commentermo
I have great respect for the Roman Catholic Church, inspite of its many flaws. Any "organization" thats been around for 2000 years (give or take 300) is bound to have some dark seasons, some bad leaders. I feel that the denominations are the result of some sort of "modern" babble, and serve to illustrate the one body many parts teaching. As far as being here in "Indian" country...one of the major conflicts is culture vs Christianity. For many years the belief of the Dine' (people) was that you can not be both Christian and Navajo. We have a good friend who, after 30 years is still torn between the two. If he is a Christian he must stop being a Navajo, If he is a Navajo he must stop being a Christian. Funny, that the LORD is using a Russian Jew with a smidge of native blood (my husband) and a German, Italian, whose ansesters helped cheat the natives out of Manhattan Island (me) to help these people find some sort of balance.Yes, it is exciting!
April 16, 2005 | Unregistered Commentermaryellen
i was refering to the division thing. 4,592 denominations and counting...

(i, um, made up that number. but you get the idea.)
April 16, 2005 | Unregistered Commenteradam

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>